People v. McGinnis

8 A.D.3d 756, 778 N.Y.S.2d 240, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7904
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 756 (People v. McGinnis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McGinnis, 8 A.D.3d 756, 778 N.Y.S.2d 240, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[757]*757Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), rendered June 21, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a multicount indictment, defendant, who was 18 years old at the time of the charged crimes, pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of rape in the third degree. At sentencing, County Court denied defendant youthful offender status and imposed the agreed-upon sentence of 1 to 3 years in prison. Defendant appeals, contending that the court abused its discretion in failing to adjudicate him a youthful offender in light of, among other things, his abusive family situation.

We disagree. Whether to grant youthful offender status rests within the discretion of the sentencing court (see People v Chappelle, 282 AD2d 881, 881-882 [2001]; People v Annette, 262 AD2d 670 [1999]; People v Roy, 245 AD2d 878 [1997]). Inasmuch as the record reflects that County Court appropriately considered the circumstances of the crime involving a 14-year-old girl, that defendant had been granted youthful offender status on two prior occasions and given the recommendation of the probation department in denying defendant’s status as a youthful offender, we find no abuse of the court’s discretion in denying defendant youthful offender status.

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ABL RPC Residential Credit Acquisition LLC v. 309 N. Ave. LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 32287(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2025)
U.S. Bank Trust N.A. v. Richardson
2025 NY Slip Op 32245(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2025)
People v. McLucas
58 A.D.3d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Wise
29 A.D.3d 1216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Driggs
24 A.D.3d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 756, 778 N.Y.S.2d 240, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcginnis-nyappdiv-2004.