People v. Rosengarten
This text of 72 N.E.2d 623 (People v. Rosengarten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Judgments affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ., concur in the single case charging defendant with having failed to tag meat with the sale price but in the remaining six cases dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that the evidence adduced by the People was not sufficient in law to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of the defendant of the charge made against him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 N.E.2d 623, 296 N.Y. 903, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rosengarten-ny-1947.