People v. Rosario

253 A.D.2d 706, 680 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9662
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 24, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), rendered August 22, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a determinate sentence of 7 years imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The viewing of the photographs by the three complainants in the same room was not unduly suggestive, since the complainants were seated six feet apart, viewed over 2,000 photos separately and did not confer with one another upon identifying photos of defendant. There is no evidence that any complainant saw which picture any other complainant identified (see, People v Magee, 122 AD2d 227; People v Cummings, 109 AD2d 748). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosario, 253 A.D.2d 706, 680 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

253 A.D.2d 706 (People v. Rosario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seymour
77 A.D.3d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Rodriguez
17 A.D.3d 1127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)