People v. Rosario

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Rosario

639 N.E.2d 1131, 83 N.Y.2d 994

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 7, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 639 N.E.2d 1131 (People v. Rosario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rosario, 639 N.E.2d 1131, 83 N.Y.2d 994 (N.Y. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division in each case should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

In these cases involving charges of criminal narcotics sale arising out of a street "buy and bust,” the trial court erred by closing the trial to the public during the undercover officers’ testimony. The trial court’s ruling in 1991 was based on a legal standard that is no longer viable under our analysis and holding in People v Martinez (82 NY2d 436), decided in 1993.

In view of our disposition of the closure issue, we have no need to reach the parties’ arguments regarding the claimed Rosario violation.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur in memorandum.

In each case: Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI