People v. Rosado
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2066 (People v. Rosado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Warhit, J.), rendered March 5, 2013, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, West-chester County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
The Supreme Court was required to determine on the record whether the defendant, whose conviction of burglary in the first degree constituted an armed felony (see CPL 1.20 [41]; Penal Law §§ 70.02 [1] [a]; 140.30 [4]), was an “eligible youth” (CPL 720.10 [2], [3]) and, if so, whether he should be afforded youthful offender status (see People v Middlebrooks, 25 NY3d 516, 519 [2015]; People v Rudolph, 21 NY3d 497, 501 [2013]; People v Alston, 145 AD3d 737 [2016]). Here, as the People correctly concede, the record does not demonstrate that the court made that determination. Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for resentencing after making this determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 2066, 148 A.D.3d 1058, 48 N.Y.S.3d 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rosado-nyappdiv-2017.