People v. Lessane

2019 NY Slip Op 1097
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 2019
DocketInd. No. 5937/05
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1097 (People v. Lessane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lessane, 2019 NY Slip Op 1097 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Lessane (2019 NY Slip Op 01097)
People v Lessane
2019 NY Slip Op 01097
Decided on February 13, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 13, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2017-03797
(Ind. No. 5937/05)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Terrence Lessane, appellant.


Mintz & Oppenheim, LLP, New York, NY (Marshall A. Mintz of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Neil Jon Firetog, J.), rendered March 13, 2017, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The Supreme Court was required to determine on the record whether the defendant was an "eligible youth" (CPL 720.10[2]; see CPL 720.10[3]) and, if so, whether he should be afforded youthful offender status (see People v Middlebrooks, 25 NY3d 516, 519; People v Rudolph, 21 NY3d 497, 501; People v Rosado, 148 AD3d 1058; People v Alston, 145 AD3d 737). As the People correctly concede, the record does not demonstrate that the court made that determination. Accordingly, the defendant's sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing after making this determination.

LEVENTHAL, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. William Middlebrooks / The People v. Fabrice Lowe
35 N.E.3d 464 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. McEachern
2016 NY Slip Op 8248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Rosado
2017 NY Slip Op 2066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Rudolph
997 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lessane-nyappdiv-2019.