People v. Rooks
223 N.E.2d 897, 18 N.Y.2d 960
This text of 223 N.E.2d 897 (People v. Rooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Rooks, 223 N.E.2d 897, 18 N.Y.2d 960 (N.Y. 1966).
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
James Rooks, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Abraham H. Brodsky for appellant.
Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney (Stanley M. Meyer of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.
Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Rooks
223 N.E.2d 897 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
223 N.E.2d 897, 18 N.Y.2d 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rooks-ny-1966.