People v. Romero

2017 NY Slip Op 6463, 153 A.D.3d 1285, 59 N.Y.S.3d 713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Romero. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 A.D.3d 1147
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 13, 2017·No. 2015-12094·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed November 10, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Medina, 138 AD3d 1148 [2016]; People v Sulsona, 134 AD3d 861 [2015]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Romero, 2017 NY Slip Op 6463, 153 A.D.3d 1285, 59 N.Y.S.3d 713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 6463 (People v. Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Sulsona
134 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Medina
138 A.D.3d 1148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)