People v. Roman

2023 NY Slip Op 02464
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 2023
DocketInd No. 30030/18 Appeal No. 196 Case No. 2019-307
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 02464 (People v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Roman, 2023 NY Slip Op 02464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Roman (2023 NY Slip Op 02464)
People v Roman
2023 NY Slip Op 02464
Decided on May 09, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 09, 2023
Before: Renwick, A.P.J., Kapnick, Gesmer, Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, JJ.

Ind. No. 30030/18 Appeal No. 196 Case No. 2019-307

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Michael Roman, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Rebecca D. Martin of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Conor E. Byrnes of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), entered on or about May 4, 2018, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant, including his satisfactory but unexceptional performance in sex offender treatment, were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by the egregiousness of the underlying sex crime, which was committed against a three-year-old child. Defendant did not establish that his age and health issues would reduce his risk of reoffense (see People v Ramos, 199 AD3d 423, 423 [1st Dept 2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 910 [2022]), or that any of his point assessments overstate that risk. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 9, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Roman
2023 NY Slip Op 02464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 02464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roman-nyappdiv-2023.