People v. Roman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Roman

2019 NY Slip Op 4000

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Roman. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 A.D.3d 476 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 22, 2019·No. 2017-11806·Published

Opinion

People v Roman (2019 NY Slip Op 04000)

People v Roman

2019 NY Slip Op 04000

Decided on May 22, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 22, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2017-11806
2017-11807

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Diego Roman, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 8973/16, 10169/16)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew J. D'Emic, J.), both rendered September 11, 2017, convicting him of burglary in the first degree under Indictment No. 8973/16 and criminal contempt in the first degree under Indictment No. 10169/16, respectively, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v Roman (2019 NY Slip Op 04000)

People v Roman

2019 NY Slip Op 04000

Decided on May 22, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 22, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2017-11806
2017-11807

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Diego Roman, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 8973/16, 10169/16)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew J. D'Emic, J.), both rendered September 11, 2017, convicting him of burglary in the first degree under Indictment No. 8973/16 and criminal contempt in the first degree under Indictment No. 10169/16, respectively, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court

People v. Roman, 2019 NY Slip Op 4000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

2019 NY Slip Op 4000 (People v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related