People v. Roman

2020 NY Slip Op 707, 114 N.Y.S.3d 911, 179 A.D.3d 1455
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2020
Docket68 KA 19-00805
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 707 (People v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Roman, 2020 NY Slip Op 707, 114 N.Y.S.3d 911, 179 A.D.3d 1455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Roman (2020 NY Slip Op 00707)
People v Roman
2020 NY Slip Op 00707
Decided on January 31, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 31, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

68 KA 19-00805

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

GUSTAVO ROMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Christopher S. Ciaccio, J.), entered January 26, 2019. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court erred in assessing points under risk factors four and five of the risk assessment instrument. As defendant correctly concedes, his contentions are not preserved for our review (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 854 [2014]; People v Saraceni, 153 AD3d 1561, 1561 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 1119 [2018]), and we decline to exercise our power to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Charache, 32 AD3d 1345, 1345 [4th Dept 2006], affd 9 NY3d 829 [2007]; People v Jones, 15 AD3d 929, 930 [4th Dept 2005]; see also Saraceni, 153 AD3d at 1561).

Entered: January 31, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Webster
2024 NY Slip Op 00577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Finster
214 A.D.3d 1336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Turner
2020 NY Slip Op 06906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 707, 114 N.Y.S.3d 911, 179 A.D.3d 1455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roman-nyappdiv-2020.