Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Roman

People v. Roman

262 A.D.2d 1050, 691 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Roman. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 A.D.2d 831 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 1999·Published

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We disagree. The record establishes that the jury properly “ ‘weighted] the relative probative force of conflicting testimony and the relative [1051]*1051strength of conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the testimony’ ” in reaching its verdict (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495, quoting People ex rel. MacCracken v Miller, 291 NY 55, 62). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roman, 262 A.D.2d 1050, 691 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7289 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 1050 (People v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. MacCracken v. Miller
50 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)