People v. Roman

250 A.D.2d 477, 672 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6189
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Roman. Read the opinion of the Court — 217 A.D.2d 473

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Williams, J.), rendered September 11, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5V2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The existing record, which defendant has not sought to amplify by way of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 998) establishes that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021, 1024; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

Defendant’s arguments concerning his motion made pursuant to CPL 190.50 (5) (c) are without merit (see, People v Wiggins, 89 NY2d 872). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roman, 250 A.D.2d 477, 672 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

250 A.D.2d 477 (People v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wiggins
675 N.E.2d 845 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Hobot
646 N.E.2d 1102 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Love
443 N.E.2d 486 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)