People v. Roldan

120 A.D.3d 1269, 991 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2014 NY Slip Op 06110, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6054
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 10, 2014·No. 2012-00301·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), imposed December 9, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, EJ., Mastro, Hall and Roman, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roldan, 120 A.D.3d 1269, 991 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2014 NY Slip Op 06110, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

120 A.D.3d 1269 (People v. Roldan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Taylor
130 A.D.3d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)