People v. Rojas

2017 NY Slip Op 2163, 148 A.D.3d 587, 48 N.Y.S.3d 605
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rojas. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 A.D.3d 543
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 2017·No. 5311/10 3507A 4742/14 3507·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from *588 judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered May 7, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rojas, 2017 NY Slip Op 2163, 148 A.D.3d 587, 48 N.Y.S.3d 605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 2163 (People v. Rojas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.