People v. Rojas
This text of 129 A.D.3d 747 (People v. Rojas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Morgenstern, J.), imposed March 17, 2014, on the ground that the amended resentence was excessive. The defendant’s notice of appeal from a resentence of the same court imposed January 28, 2014, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the amended resentence imposed March 17, 2014 (see CPL 460.10 [1] [b]).
Ordered that the amended resentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]). However, the amended resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.3d 747, 9 N.Y.S.3d 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rojas-nyappdiv-2015.