People v. Rohrlich

159 N.E.2d 353, 6 N.Y.2d 785

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 14, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

6 N.Y.2d 785 (1959)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Bernard Rohrlich, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 7, 1959. Decided May 14, 1959.

David M. Markowitz for appellant.

Edward S. Silver, District Attorney (William I. Siegal and Aaron Nussbaum of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

6 N.Y.2d 785 (1959)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Bernard Rohrlich, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 7, 1959. Decided May 14, 1959.

David M. Markowitz for appellant.

Edward S. Silver, District Attorney (William I. Siegal and Aaron Nussbaum of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

People v. Rohrlich, 159 N.E.2d 353, 6 N.Y.2d 785 (N.Y. 1959).

Pincite

159 N.E.2d 353 (People v. Rohrlich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pokoik

83 Misc. 2d 669 (New York Town and Village Courts, 1975)