People v. Rogers
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dante Antoine ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration under the standard for direct appeals, because the defendant was deprived of his direct appeal as a result of constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. See Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 477, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000); Peguero v. United States, 526 U.S. 23, 28, 119 S.Ct. 961, 143 L.Ed.2d 18 (1999).
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
775 N.W.2d 742 (People v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.