Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Rodriguez

People v. Rodriguez

2017 NY Slip Op 5104, 151 A.D.3d 984, 54 N.Y.S.3d 318
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D.3d 538 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 21, 2017·No. 2016-01305·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Margulis, J.), imposed July 22, 2015, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; *985 People v Calinda, 142 AD3d 1183 [2016]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 2017 NY Slip Op 5104, 151 A.D.3d 984, 54 N.Y.S.3d 318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5104 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Calinda
142 A.D.3d 1183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)