People v. Calinda
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Margulis, J.), imposed March 26, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
*1184 Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955 [2012]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
142 A.D.3d 1183 (People v. Calinda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.