People v. Rodriguez

128 A.D.3d 603, 9 N.Y.S.3d 268
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 26, 2015·No. 15235 2498/13·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John S. Moore, J.), entered on or about November 18, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s upward departure was supported by clear and convincing evidence establishing aggravating factors that were not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. First, the assessment of points for the victim’s age being under 11 did not sufficiently reflect the aggravating factor of the victim being only five years old (see People v Mantilla, 70 AD3d 477, 478 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 706 [2010]). Second, defendant made a strange and disturbing *604 statement in a presentence interview, alleging that the five-year-old child invited defendant’s sexual conduct, and implying that defendant was justified in accepting the purported invitation. Such a statement evinces a state of mind that poses a danger to children. This statement was both a proper basis for an assessment of points under the risk factor for failing to accept responsibility (see People v Yomtov, 105 AD3d 422, 422 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 858 [2013]), and a further basis, as cited by the court, for the upward departure because its egregiousness was not adequately taken into account. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Saxe and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 128 A.D.3d 603, 9 N.Y.S.3d 268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

128 A.D.3d 603 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Reid
141 A.D.3d 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)