People v. Rodriguez

101 A.D.3d 630, 955 N.Y.2d 867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 A.D.3d 815

Opinion

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant defendant a downward departure (see People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406, 409 [2010]). The mitigating factors he cites were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying sex crime, which resulted in the death of the victim, as well as by defend[631]*631ant’s criminal history and his prison disciplinary infractions. Defendant has not established that his medical condition eliminates any significant risk of reoffense. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Richter and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 101 A.D.3d 630, 955 N.Y.2d 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

101 A.D.3d 630 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pettigrew
927 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)