People v. Rodriguez

127 A.D.3d 670, 6 N.Y.S.3d 915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 A.D.3d 246
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2015·No. 14982 1790/11·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ann M. Donnelly, J.), rendered November 26, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of two to six years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification, including its evaluation of inconsistencies. There was ample evidence of defendant’s guilt, including a prompt identification, physical evidence, and incriminating statements.

After considering the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]), we conclude that defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Very little of the approximately 17-month delay was attributable to the People, and we find defendant’s claim that he was prejudiced by the delay unpersuasive.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims, including those related to the loss of a 911 tape and alleged ineffective assistance of counsel.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 127 A.D.3d 670, 6 N.Y.S.3d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

127 A.D.3d 670 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Taranovich
335 N.E.2d 303 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)