People v. Rodriguez

113 A.D.3d 553, 979 N.Y.2d 517
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 A.D.3d 449

Opinion

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The jury could have reasonably concluded that when defendant beat the victim with the handle of a machete, resulting in multiple injuries, this object constituted a dangerous instrument under the circumstances in which it was used, within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (13).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Acosta, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 113 A.D.3d 553, 979 N.Y.2d 517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

113 A.D.3d 553 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)