People v. Rodriguez
88 A.D.3d 557, 931 N.Y.2d 230
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 20, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rodriguez, 88 A.D.3d 557, 931 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
88 A.D.3d 557 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Velez
975 N.E.2d 907 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)