People v. Rodriguez

295 A.D.2d 919, 744 N.Y.S.2d 734, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6195
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brunetti, J.), [920]*920entered May 17, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.41 [1]) and sentencing him as a second felony offender to a term of incarceration of six years to life. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the bargained-for sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. We further reject defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of the second felony offender sentencing scheme (see People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329, 335, cert denied 534 US 899; People v Perez, 292 AD2d 859). Finally, the record establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see People v Grant, 288 AD2d 898, lv denied 97 NY2d 682). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hayes, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 295 A.D.2d 919, 744 N.Y.S.2d 734, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

295 A.D.2d 919 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ferguson
299 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)