People v. Rodriguez

271 A.D.2d 462, 706 N.Y.S.2d 897, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3719
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 A.D.2d 150

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.), rendered September 30, 1997, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that there was an unreasonable delay in sentencing which deprived the Supreme Court of jurisdiction (see, People v Brown, 252 AD2d 592; see generally, CPL 380.30 [1]; People v Drake, 61 NY2d 359).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 271 A.D.2d 462, 706 N.Y.S.2d 897, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

271 A.D.2d 462 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Drake
462 N.E.2d 376 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Brown
252 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)