People v. Rodriguez

245 A.D.2d 316, 667 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12024
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeals by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), all rendered September 1, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts, one each as to Indictment Nos. 92-00616 and 92-00617); and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (under Indictment No. 92-00651), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The record in this case reveals that during plea negotiations the defendant withdrew all of his pretrial motions. Accordingly, the defendant is foreclosed from challenging on appeal the County Court’s denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which were, inter alia, to controvert an eavesdropping warrant, suppress wiretap evidence, produce confidential informants, and change venue (see, People v Sebastian, 197 AD2d 647; People v Conte, 186 AD2d 579; People v Jackson, 142 AD2d 689). Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 245 A.D.2d 316, 667 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12024 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 316 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
256 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)