People v. Rodriguez

210 A.D.2d 25, 619 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11831
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 A.D.2d 554

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered January 13, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

While the prosecutor improperly made a brief reference before the jury to the fact that defendant had failed to [26]*26produce a witness who was not under defendant’s control (see, People v Rodriguez, 38 NY2d 95, 98), that statement was made in reliance upon the court’s initial response that it would issue a missing witness charge, although the charge was never given. However, proof of guilt was overwhelming and the error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

In view of defendant’s prior criminal record, the sentence imposed, which is only slightly more than the minimum permissible sentence, was not excessive (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 210 A.D.2d 25, 619 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 25 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Rodriguez
341 N.E.2d 231 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Farrar
419 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)