People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rodriguez

157 A.D.2d 869, 551 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1016

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.D.2d 869 (People v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rodriguez, 157 A.D.2d 869, 551 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.), rendered April 28, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court did consider the statements made by him at sentencing regarding the circumstances of the crime before imposing the negotiated sentence. In addition, there is no merit to the defendant’s further claim that the County Court should have treated the statements made by him at sentencing as a request to withdraw his plea. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.), rendered April 28, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court did consider the statements made by him at sentencing regarding the circumstances of the crime before imposing the negotiated sentence. In addition, there is no merit to the defendant’s further claim that the County Court should have treated the statements made by him at sentencing as a request to withdraw his plea. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A.D.2d 869, 551 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rodriguez-nyappdiv-1990.