People v. Bezear

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bezear

208 A.D.2d 446, 617 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 446 (People v. Bezear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bezear, 208 A.D.2d 446, 617 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered May 7, 1991, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of rape in the first degree (two counts), and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the action of the hotel’s private security guard is not subject to Fourth Amendment challenge (see, People v Ray, 65 NY2d 282). In any event, we note that the record shows that the private security guard had ample basis to detain the defendant for criminal trespass based upon defendant’s lack of any substantiated reason for being in the premises (see, People v Rodriguez, 159 AD2d 201, lv denied 76 NY2d 742). Concur—Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered May 7, 1991, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of rape in the first degree (two counts), and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the action of the hotel’s private security guard is not subject to Fourth Amendment challenge (see, People v Ray, 65 NY2d 282). In any event, we note that the record shows that the private security guard had ample basis to detain the defendant for criminal trespass based upon defendant’s lack of any substantiated reason for being in the premises (see, People v Rodriguez, 159 AD2d 201, lv denied 76 NY2d 742). Concur—Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 446, 617 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bezear-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack