People v. Rodriguez

722 N.W.2d 853, 477 Mich. 902
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 31, 2006·No. 131046·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

722 N.W.2d 853 (2006)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Frank C. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 131046. COA No. 265073.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 31, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion to amend is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court to determine whether the changes to the defendant's Presentence Investigation Report ordered by the circuit court at the defendant's December 12, 1997 sentencing hearing have been made and, if not, for the amendment of the report. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 722 N.W.2d 853, 477 Mich. 902 (Mich. 2006).

722 N.W.2d 853 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Jones
625 F. Supp. 2d 552 (E.D. Michigan, 2009)