People v. Rodriguez
This text of 689 N.W.2d 234 (People v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE
v.
RODRIGUEZ
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 124776, COA: 249262.
By order of March 26, 2004, the prosecuting attorney was directed to file a supplemental answer to defendant's application for leave to appeal. On order of the Court, the answer having been filed, the application for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would hold this case in abeyance for Kowalski v. Tesmer, cert. gtd. ___ U.S. ___; 124 S.Ct. 1144; 157 L.Ed.2d 1041 (2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 N.W.2d 234, 471 Mich. 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rodriguez-mich-2004.