People v. Rockwell

39 Mich. 503, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 343
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 29, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 39 Mich. 503 (People v. Rockwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rockwell, 39 Mich. 503, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 343 (Mich. 1878).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.

Respondent was convicted of manslaughter for killing one Wilber. The death occurred during a dispute concerning the possession of a horse. Rockwell was shown to have struck Wilber with his fist and knocked him down. It was not shown directly how he was killed, but it appeared distinctly this blow did not kill him. The facts indicated either that Rockwell kicked him after he -fell, or else that he was killed by the horse trampling on him. On a first trial the jury disagreed. On a second trial, after being out some time, they came in and asked the court to instruct them “whether the respondent would be guilty if he knocked Wilber down, and the horse jumped on him (Wilber) or kicked him, and thus lulled him.” To which inquiry the court, as the record shows, reiterated that portion of the charge before given that he would be so guilty. The jury -then found him guilty.

The charge before given was unqualified that if the blow was not justifiable and Wilber so fell that the horse jumped and struck Wilber and killed him with his feet, or kicking him, respondent was guilty.

It is impossible to maintain such a charge without making every one liable not only for natural and probable consequences, but for all possible consequences and circumstances which immediately follow a wrongful act. There Was no necessary connection between the act of respondent and the conduct of the horse, which he cannot be said from the record to have been responsible for. And the case was not even put as permissive. The liability was laid down as positive.

The conviction cannot be maintained. And inasmuch as it is clear from the record that the jury would not have convicted except upon this instruction, we think the court below should be advised to stop the prosecution.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People of Michigan v. James Robert Crumbley
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2023
People v. Schaefer
703 N.W.2d 774 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)
People of Michigan v. James Richard Large
Michigan Supreme Court, 2005
People v. Lardie
551 N.W.2d 656 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1996)
People v. Tims
534 N.W.2d 675 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1995)
People v. Datema
533 N.W.2d 272 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1995)
People v. Moss
245 N.W.2d 389 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Hubbard v. Commonwealth
202 S.W.2d 634 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1947)
Letner v. State
299 S.W. 1049 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1927)
People v. Barnes
148 N.W. 400 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)
State v. Denny
117 N.W. 869 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Mich. 503, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rockwell-mich-1878.