People v. Robles

300 A.D.2d 73, 750 N.Y.S.2d 756, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12031
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Robles. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 A.D.3d 180

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered October 5, 2000, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warrants the conclusion that when defendant pointed a knife at a store clerk and threatened to kill him, and then stole packs of cigarettes as the clerk hid behind the counter, defendant was threatening the use of force to prevent any resistance to the [74]*74theft (Penal Law § 160.00 [1]). Defendant’s alternative explanation for his conduct is unsupported by the record and was properly rejected by the court.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robles, 300 A.D.2d 73, 750 N.Y.S.2d 756, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 73 (People v. Robles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 160.00
New York PEN § 160.00