People v. Robles

276 A.D.2d 325, 714 N.Y.S.2d 214, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Robles. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D.2d 20

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J., at hearing; Dorothy Cropper, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered October 19, 1998, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Although defendant’s suppression motion should have been [326]*326granted on the ground that the statements made by defendant without Miranda warnings were the product of custodial interrogation, the error was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s application for an adjournment for the purpose of securing the presence of two proposed defense witnesses. Defendant failed to make the requisite showing of diligence and of the likelihood of the witnesses’ appearance (see, People v Foy, 32 NY2d 473). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robles, 276 A.D.2d 325, 714 N.Y.S.2d 214, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 325 (People v. Robles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Foy
299 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)