People v. Robles
369 N.E.2d 770, 42 N.Y.2d 1051, 399 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2388
Opinion
Motion for extension of time within which to move for reargument granted. Motion for reargument denied, in the absence of manifest injustice (see People v Rivera, 16 NY2d 879, denying reargument on the ground that retroactive application after the appeal process had been exhausted would not be accorded to this court’s holding in People v Donovan, 13 NY2d 148, also a case excluding a defendant’s inculpatory statement during detention and while defendant was represented by a lawyer). [See 27 NY2d 155.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Robles, 369 N.E.2d 770, 42 N.Y.2d 1051, 399 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2388 (N.Y. 1977).
369 N.E.2d 770 (People v. Robles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Peterson
164 Misc. 2d 103 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)
People v. Holland
179 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Alvarez
151 Misc. 2d 697 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Donovon
107 A.D.2d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People ex rel. Rodriguez v. Harris
84 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Pepper
423 N.E.2d 366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Wooden
388 N.E.2d 349 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)