People v. Rivera

211 N.E.2d 649, 16 N.Y.2d 879, 264 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1127
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 1965·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Retroactive application is not to be accorded this court’s holding in People v. Donovan (13 N Y 2d 148) (see, also, People v. Failla, 14 N Y 2d 178; People v. Gunner, 15 N Y 2d 226; People v. Sanchez, 15 N Y 2d 387) that a defendant’s inculpatory statement is inadmissible when made to the police or other law enforcement officers during a period of detention after his attorney had requested and been denied access to him. (See, e.g., People v. Howard, 12 N Y 2d 65; see, also, People v. Muller, 11 N Y 2d 154; Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U. S. 618.) [See 300 N. Y. 594.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 211 N.E.2d 649, 16 N.Y.2d 879, 264 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1127 (N.Y. 1965).

211 N.E.2d 649 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Alvarez
151 Misc. 2d 697 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Donovon
107 A.D.2d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People ex rel. Rodriguez v. Harris
84 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Pepper
423 N.E.2d 366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Robles
369 N.E.2d 770 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)