People v. Robinson

176 A.D.2d 830
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 A.D.2d 184

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered July 24, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the totality of the circumstances, we find that the defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Vega, 158 AD2d 258).

The defendant’s contention that the sentence is excessive is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was imposed. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 176 A.D.2d 830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 830 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Vega
158 A.D.2d 258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)