People v. Robinson

152 A.D.2d 939, 543 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9806
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D.2d 173

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a conviction, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the second degree. Defendant’s claim that he was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct was not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and discretionary review in the interest of justice [940]*940is not warranted. Contrary to appellate counsel’s contention, the trial court, in ruling upon the Sandoval motion, did not preclude the prosecutor from cross-examining defendant regarding a prior conviction for disorderly conduct. Further, the prosecutor did not deliberately elicit testimony from the police officer that the serial number of a car stereo taken from defendant at the time of his arrest was recorded on a police property recovery slip, and this single, isolated reference to the slip was not so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial.

Finally, we reject defendant’s claim that the sentence im-

posed was unduly harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 152 A.D.2d 939, 543 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 939 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.