People v. Robinson

71 A.D.2d 1008, 420 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13347
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 24, 1979·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 30, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The Trial Judge’s antagonistic attitude toward, and disparagement of, defense counsel and the Judge’s undue participation during the course of the trial require that the judgment be reversed and a new trial had (see People v De Jesus, 42 NY2d 519; People v Harrison, 51 AD2d 589; People v Richburg, 47 AD2d 909). Notwithstanding any provocations or pressures which may arise during a trial, a defendant’s entitlement to a fair trial and the effective assistance of counsel must be scrupulously safeguarded. A reversal is required despite the strong evidence of guilt adduced at the trial (see People v Mees, 47 NY2d 997). O’Connor, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 71 A.D.2d 1008, 420 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

71 A.D.2d 1008 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Melero
79 A.D.2d 686 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)