People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Robinson

53 A.D.2d 634, 384 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13347

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 634 (People v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Robinson, 53 A.D.2d 634, 384 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 9, 1975, as granted that branch of defendant’s motion which sought to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, motion insofar as it sought to dismiss the indictment denied, and indictment reinstated. No findings of fact have been considered. The proof before the Grand Jury was sufficient to sustain the indictment (see CPL 190.65, subd 1); there was no " 'clear showing’ that the evidence before the Grand Jury if unexplained and uncontradicted would not warrant a conviction by a trial jury” (see People v Ward, 37 AD2d 174, 176; People v Eason, 45 AD2d 863). We note, in passing, that the indictment, which charged defendant with murder in the second degree (Penal Law, § 125.25, subd 1), alleged, inter alia, that defendant had caused the victim’s death "by striking her with a knife”; although there was no direct evidence before the Grand Jury that defendant possessed a knife, the allegation as to the manner in which the victim’s death was caused was merely surplusage. Accordingly, the absence of such evidence did not vitiate the indictment (see People v Laurence, 137 NY 517, 524). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 9, 1975, as granted that branch of defendant’s motion which sought to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, motion insofar as it sought to dismiss the indictment denied, and indictment reinstated. No findings of fact have been considered. The proof before the Grand Jury was sufficient to sustain the indictment (see CPL 190.65, subd 1); there was no " 'clear showing’ that the evidence before the Grand Jury if unexplained and uncontradicted would not warrant a conviction by a trial jury” (see People v Ward, 37 AD2d 174, 176; People v Eason, 45 AD2d 863). We note, in passing, that the indictment, which charged defendant with murder in the second degree (Penal Law, § 125.25, subd 1), alleged, inter alia, that defendant had caused the victim’s death "by striking her with a knife”; although there was no direct evidence before the Grand Jury that defendant possessed a knife, the allegation as to the manner in which the victim’s death was caused was merely surplusage. Accordingly, the absence of such evidence did not vitiate the indictment (see People v Laurence, 137 NY 517, 524). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 634, 384 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robinson-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack