People v. Rivera

278 A.D.2d 133, 717 N.Y.S.2d 541, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14018
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rivera. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 A.D.2d 286

Opinion

Judgment, Su[134]*134preme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered March 12, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 44/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim of improper summation by the prosecutor is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the prosecutor’s attacks on defense counsel’s summation did not distract the jury’s attention from the issues or deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Richards, 207 AD2d 660, lv denied 84 NY2d 1037; People v Colon, 172 AD2d 173, affd 78 NY2d 998). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Wallach, Lerner, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 278 A.D.2d 133, 717 N.Y.S.2d 541, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 133 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Colon
78 N.Y.2d 998 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Colon
172 A.D.2d 173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Richards
207 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)