People v. Colon

78 N.Y.2d 998
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 1991·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division determined that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of defense witnesses did not exceed the bounds of discretion and was not error. It also concluded that the prosecutor’s summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. Finally, it found unpreserved the issue involving a missing witness instruction to the jury. On this record, this Court has no basis as a matter of law on which to disturb the Appellate Division’s resolution of the first two claims and cannot review the unpreserved third issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Colon, 78 N.Y.2d 998 (N.Y. 1991).

78 N.Y.2d 998 (People v. Colon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rivera
278 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Goncalves
239 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Bueno
222 A.D.2d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Silen
188 A.D.2d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
United States v. Clifton
35 M.J. 79 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1992)
People v. Gonzales
185 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Villarino
184 A.D.2d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Martinez
179 A.D.2d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)