People v. Rivera

243 A.D.2d 587, 665 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9761
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rivera. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 A.D.2d 895

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered February 27, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable [588]*588doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People v Carlstrol, 231 AD2d 646). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 243 A.D.2d 587, 665 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 587 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Carlstrol
231 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)