People v. Rivera

209 A.D.2d 648, 619 N.Y.S.2d 662
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), rendered September 14, 1992, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (three counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, and conspiracy in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal at the time that he entered his plea of guilty (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; cf., People v Bray, 154 AD2d 692). Thus, we will not review the court’s denial of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

The sentencing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty on the basis that it was not voluntarily made (see, People v Kelly, 159 AD2d 227; see generally, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 209 A.D.2d 648, 619 N.Y.S.2d 662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 648 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stater
248 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Rivera
247 A.D.2d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Byrd
225 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)