People v. Rivera

225 A.D.2d 638, 639 N.Y.2d 728, 639 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2125
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rivera. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 A.D.2d 561

Opinion

There is no evidence in the record to support the defendant’s contention that one of the jurors was coerced into making a decision to convict the defendant. Additionally, the court’s in camera discussion with the juror, at the juror’s request and out of the presence of the other jurors, was not inherently improper or coercive (compare, People v Perfetto, 96 AD2d 517).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find no basis for reversal. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 225 A.D.2d 638, 639 N.Y.2d 728, 639 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

225 A.D.2d 638 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Perfetto
96 A.D.2d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)