People v. Rivera

194 A.D.2d 697, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rivera. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 A.D.2d 678

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), rendered August 8, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[698]*698The defendant’s contention that the court erred in admitting evidence of uncharged drug sales is without merit. Because the defendant raised an agency defense it was permissible for the court to admit evidence of other drug sales consummated both prior and subsequent to the sale for which the defendant was convicted (see, People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233; People v Oliva, 127 AD2d 706). Furthermore, the court did not err in deciding, in this case, that the probative value of the evidence outweighed its prejudicial value (see, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are also without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 194 A.D.2d 697, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

194 A.D.2d 697 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ventimiglia
420 N.E.2d 59 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Alvino
519 N.E.2d 808 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Oliva
127 A.D.2d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)