People v. Rivera

498 N.E.2d 418, 68 N.Y.2d 786, 506 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20097
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 9, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by44 cases

This text of 498 N.E.2d 418 (People v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rivera, 498 N.E.2d 418, 68 N.Y.2d 786, 506 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20097 (N.Y. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The sole issue raised by defendant on this appeal from the denial of his suppression motion is that the testimony of the arresting officer should have been rejected, as a matter of law, as incredible; only if the officer’s testimony is credited was there probable cause for the search. Each of the three alleged inconsistencies between the officer’s testimony and prior accounts was brought out during the officer’s examination and *788 separately considered by the trier of fact, who concluded from his observation of the witness and review of the evidence that the officer’s testimony at the suppression hearing was credible. This is not a case where testimony is so flawed that findings as to a witness’s credibility made from the unique perspective of the trier of fact must be overridden (see, People v Reed, 64 NY2d 1144, 1147; People v Concepcion, 38 NY2d 211, 213).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Colin
2024 NY Slip Op 05294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Addison
2021 NY Slip Op 06225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Murray
58 A.D.3d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Nygee T.
281 A.D.2d 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Richardson
254 A.D.2d 197 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Hopkins
244 A.D.2d 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re Manuel H.
237 A.D.2d 109 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Brown
233 A.D.2d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Lawrence
232 A.D.2d 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Contrero
232 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Jamal G.
196 A.D.2d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Bazilo
196 A.D.2d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Johnson
193 A.D.2d 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Quinones
192 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Quinonez
186 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Deangelis
186 A.D.2d 397 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Jones
184 A.D.2d 227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Thomas
183 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Ferrer
183 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Dellamore
182 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 N.E.2d 418, 68 N.Y.2d 786, 506 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rivera-ny-1986.