People v. Richardson

248 A.D.2d 734, 670 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3393

This text of 248 A.D.2d 734 (People v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Richardson, 248 A.D.2d 734, 670 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered September 14, 1995, convicting him of assault in the second degree, tampering with physical evidence, resisting arrest, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D.2d 734, 670 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-richardson-nyappdiv-1998.